An example of this is a case of disagreement over children`s visits. Fathers have the right to visit their children, but most of the time, mothers limit fathers to visiting their children unless they pay (needless to say, fathers should take care of them). Instead of making a very difficult complaint that would have a negative impact on the child, the parties could simply reach a compromise agreement. This compromise agreement must be formal and written and submitted to the judge for approval. This is a kind of request accepted by a judge, in the case where the author, when he has written an ex-parte request for renewal for a compromise agreement, is to convince the court to grant an extension (more time needed). An ex parte application means that the lawyer pleads on behalf of a party or an external party. In contrast, a compromise agreement is an out-of-court agreement in which two or more parties agree on terms acceptable to both of them. This then reduces the case of litigation or judicial intervention. We already have a very slow court system and if cases that are not essential still make it to the courts, it will overload the system. There are cases where an amicable settlement could be reached, so this will be the best option. An amicable agreement means a compromise agreement. The text on the extension for the presentation of a compromise agreement in the case of an application for an exparte is intended to convince the reader.
Indeed, in the writings presented in such situations, the author tries to share an opinion, that is, his perspective, but facts and examples are also involved to “convince” the reader of his perspective.